Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Talk XU Men's basketball here...
Anti-Homer
Posts: 4662
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby Anti-Homer » Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:14 pm

muskieman wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:04 pm
Anti-Homer wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 7:56 pm
VA down 4 with 1 minute to go. X could climb as high as two, which they should if VA loses. VA Tech is good, but VA is at home.
tied with 4.2 seconds and VA tries a long three instead of giving it to Q for the win
They don't have a Q. They have 3 shooters, none of them speedsters. They got a clean look from 3 from a very good shooter. Damn, just hit a 3 with 50 seconds. I like Tony Bennett and VA, but will root for them only after they fall comfortably behind X in the rankings.
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 21642
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby muskieman » Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:22 pm

and they fall to VTec 2-3 all lost today
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
muskienick
Posts: 964
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby muskienick » Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:03 pm

muskieman wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:04 pm
tied with 4.2 seconds and VA tries a long three instead of giving it to Q for the win
That UVa-Q crack was a good one, MM!!! (Some folks lack a sense of humor!)
Fathers James Hoff and Michael Graham, AD Mike Bobinski, and Head Coaches Staak, Gillen, Prosser, Matta, and Miller represent a Golden Era of Xavier Men's Basketball. I feel that new AD Christopher and Coach Mack will bring us to an even higher level!
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 21642
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby muskieman » Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:14 pm

muskienick wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:03 pm
muskieman wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:04 pm
tied with 4.2 seconds and VA tries a long three instead of giving it to Q for the win
That UVa-Q crack was a good one, MM!!! (Some folks lack a sense of humor!)
or it just goes over their head. Glad you enjoyed it.
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
Anti-Homer
Posts: 4662
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby Anti-Homer » Sun Feb 11, 2018 4:27 pm

muskienick wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:03 pm
muskieman wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:04 pm
tied with 4.2 seconds and VA tries a long three instead of giving it to Q for the win
That UVa-Q crack was a good one, MM!!! (Some folks lack a sense of humor!)
You can't be referring to me. I appreciate my mentor's sense of humor as much as anyone. Who do you think uploaded Mman's hilarious bit when he mimed "Who's on first" on to Youtube?
edgecliff hall
Posts: 382
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:18 am
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby edgecliff hall » Sun Feb 11, 2018 7:23 pm

Always give it to Q for the win.
longliveskip
Posts: 899
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 4:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby longliveskip » Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:27 am

muskieman wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:42 pm
What a smart play by Q. Both on drive and that in bound. Rolling into the corner knowing that CU first instinct would be to go for it and have their backs to the basket.
maybe i'm missing a rule change here but with 0.3 secs left, you can't catch and shoot, right? so what's the difference if he rolled it or not?

even if they STEAL the ball, there's still no time to be able to get a shot off, correct? i though 0.5 or less and it had to be a tip in?

just wondering.
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 21642
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Creighton Game thread 01/10/2018

Postby muskieman » Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:35 pm

longliveskip wrote:
Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:27 am
muskieman wrote:
Sat Feb 10, 2018 4:42 pm
What a smart play by Q. Both on drive and that in bound. Rolling into the corner knowing that CU first instinct would be to go for it and have their backs to the basket.
maybe i'm missing a rule change here but with 0.3 secs left, you can't catch and shoot, right? so what's the difference if he rolled it or not?

even if they STEAL the ball, there's still no time to be able to get a shot off, correct? i though 0.5 or less and it had to be a tip in?

just wondering.
I think they have disavowed that thought but just before Q rolled the ball JP and Q talked and I believe they did it so no foul could be called and that anyone touching the ball would have his back to the rim 90 feet away.
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.

Return to “Xavier Men's Basketball”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests