Where Cintas Center
TV: TruTV announcers Brandon Gaudin (pbp), Jim Spanarkel (analyst), and Jared Greenberg (reporter).
RADIO: 700WLW
Record: 4–4 overall, 0–0 in Conference USA play
Head Coach: Cuonzo Martin (second year in current stint, fifth overall season with Missouri State)
Conference Transition: Competing in Conference USA, facing strong programs like New Mexico State, Liberty, and Western Kentucky
Points per game
Missouri State Bears 78.6
Xavier Musketeers 78.7
Rebounds per game
Missouri State Bears 32.6
Xavier Musketeers 33.5
Assists per game
Missouri State Bears 14.9
Xavier Musketeers 18.5
Steals per game
Missouri State Bears 7.6
Xavier Musketeers 7.3
Blocks per game/b]
Missouri State Bears 3.5
Xavier Musketeers 3.6
Turnovers per game
Missouri State Bears 10.8
Xavier Musketeers 8.8
Fouls per game
Missouri State Bears 16.5
Xavier Musketeers 16.7
Field-goal %
Missouri State Bears 45.9%
Xavier Musketeers 42.5%
3-point %
Missouri State Bears 29.7%
Xavier Musketeers 36.7%
Free-throw %
Missouri State Bears 67.5%
Xavier Musketeers 68.1%
QUICK TAKE: MS has shown flashes of offensive firepower but struggles with consistency, especially against high-scoring teams
Recent Game Tulsa 98, Missouri State 74 (Dec 6, 2025):
Bears hit a season-high 13 three-pointers and shot 49% from the field, but defensive lapses and rebounding issues doomed them.
Kobi Williams led with 20 points (7-of-10 FG, 3 triples).
Keith Palek III added 15 points; Trey Williams Jr. chipped in 12.
Despite shooting 58.3% in the second half, Missouri State never cut the deficit below 19.
Tulsa exploited free throws (24-of-30, 80%) and rebounding (42 vs. MSU’s 26) to control the game.
Perimeter Shooting: Missouri State CAN get hot from deep (50% vs. Tulsa).
Balanced Scoring: Multiple players capable of double figures (Williams, Palek, King).
Ball Movement: Averaging nearly 15 assists per game.
Poor 3-point shooting (23.4%) limits spacing and comeback potential.
Inconsistent defense: opponents still shoot nearly 44% from the field.
Free throw struggles could hurt in close games
Rebounding Gap: Opponents often dominate the boards (Tulsa +16).
Turnovers: Costly stretches of giveaways (6 in the first half vs. Tulsa).
Defensive Consistency: Struggles to contain teams with multiple scoring threats.
Keith Palek III (F): Team leader in scoring (16.5 PPG) and assists (3.7 APG). Reliable offensive engine.
Michael Osei-Bonsu (F): Strong rebounder (7.7 RPG) and defensive presence with 2.0 steals per game.
Zaxton King (G): Secondary scorer (11.5 PPG) with efficient shooting.
Kobi Williams (G): Facilitator with 3.0 APG, though shooting efficiency is low
Home vs. Away: All four wins have come at home; all losses except one were away or against stronger mid-majors.
Offensive Output: Missouri State averages 79.3 PPG, but scoring drops significantly in road games (e.g., 49 vs UT Arlington).
Defensive Issues: Allowing 70.4 PPG; opponents like Tulsa exploited defensive lapses with high shooting efficiency.
Close Games: Narrow loss to Arkansas State (by 1 point) highlights late-game execution struggles.
Summary: Missouri State’s men’s basketball team (2025–26 season) has shown flashes of offensive strength but remains inconsistent, sitting at 4–4 overall. Their game-by-game results reveal a pattern: strong wins against weaker opponents, but struggles against tougher competition, especially on the road
