OT: Neither of these teams is very good
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:35 pm
Unlike some guys on this board, I still like the NBA, though I lean more towards the college game. But I watch this Celtics-Lakers final, and keep thinking "these are the best two teams in the league?".
A week or so ago, former NBA beat writer Sam Smith was talking to Tony Kornheiser, and in discussing this rematch of legendary NBA teams, Smith said that, when compared to the '84 Celts-Lakers teams, only Kobe would start of the current 10 starters.
He's right. Rondo? Sucks. House? OK. Allen/Garnett? Still decent, but much slowed down. Derek Fisher? Backup. Luke Walton? Same.
Odom? Nice, but not great, and too inconsistent.
One of these teams has to win, but neither will ever be compared to the NBA great teams, or even the semi-greats.
A week or so ago, former NBA beat writer Sam Smith was talking to Tony Kornheiser, and in discussing this rematch of legendary NBA teams, Smith said that, when compared to the '84 Celts-Lakers teams, only Kobe would start of the current 10 starters.
He's right. Rondo? Sucks. House? OK. Allen/Garnett? Still decent, but much slowed down. Derek Fisher? Backup. Luke Walton? Same.
Odom? Nice, but not great, and too inconsistent.
One of these teams has to win, but neither will ever be compared to the NBA great teams, or even the semi-greats.