Miller article

Talk XU Men's basketball here...
xavierj
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:45 pm
Contact:

Miller article

Postby xavierj » Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:57 pm

and some strong words from Mike Bobinski.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/ncaatourn ... id=3314395
Daaa Muskies
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Miller article

Postby Daaa Muskies » Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:16 am

"They believe they are close to being Gonzaga and can become Memphis."
My question is, do these players really believe that they are CLOSE to Gonzaga? I think Gonzaga is the team that is trying to catch up to us. And it's a shame that they're never going to be able to show that they're better than us because they refuse to play us, even in Washington state.
JaX
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:05 am
Contact:

Re: Miller article

Postby JaX » Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:22 am

But dig underneath the chip about being a mid-major and the well-toned arrogance, and you'll find kids who know that they are only fulfilling the dreams of one man. And if he's gone, things could change.


LONG time lurker, but first time poster on this board. I don't know why, but this quote from the article made me finally decide to post on the board.

With the recent boon in national attention, it reminds me just how wrong the national perception of Xavier is. Xavier may or may not be where we are today as a basketball program because of one man, but if we are, it is not because of Sean, it is because of Fr. Hoff. I, for one, contend that the success of the program is due to the commitment that the entire school administration has made. The list of "up-and-coming" successful young coaches that have left X is long, and proves that no coach is bigger than a program, IF the school is committed to the program. X is committed, so even if, God forbid, Sean leaves, we will be alright. Contrary to the belief of the author, we will not fall apart and fall out of national exposure.
xu9697
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:47 am
Contact:

Re: Miller article

Postby xu9697 » Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:02 am

Wow, what a great read. I do think X is greater than 1 man, but I also believe it is time to establish our "Bob Knight", "Dean Smith", "John Chaney", etc.
Yeti is Coming
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:00 am
Contact:

Re: Miller article

Postby Yeti is Coming » Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:19 am

Apparenty the author of this article has not seen "The Family of X" commercials (insert techo music here). A family is more than one person. X is a community! That being said, Millier is a great family member and represents us well.
vamuskie
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:45 am
Contact:

Re: Miller article

Postby vamuskie » Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:03 am

If XU wants to have our own John Chaney, maybe Miller should bust into Huggins' news conference after the game tonight and start screaming threats at him.
mookycxu
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:08 am
Contact:

Re: Miller article

Postby mookycxu » Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:35 am

well said Jax. I completely agree with your opinion on who the true architect of xavier hoops is in Father Hoff. What i am encouraged by is seeing Father Graham, and others, take that torch from Fr. Hoff and know that a guy like Miller is someone this university can get behind both in what he brings to coaching and how he represents Xavier as a whole.
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 26779
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Miller article

Postby muskieman » Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:05 pm

vamuskie wrote:If XU wants to have our own John Chaney, maybe Miller should bust into Huggins' news conference after the game tonight and start screaming threats at him.
But that would mean Xavier would have lost so that can not happen today.
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.

Return to “Xavier Men's Basketball”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 318 guests