Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Talk XU Men's basketball here...
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 26840
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby muskieman » Tue Oct 13, 2026 12:00 pm

Big day today for five-for-five eligibility rule litigation: it's oral argument day at the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for the class action lawsuit, Wisne v. NCAA.

This is the federal lawsuit that challenges the NCAA's decision to exclude the Class of 2022 under antitrust law. It's the case that produced an injunction that made the entire Class of 2022 eligible before the injunction was stayed.

Hear both sides testimony here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMrReviet-0

Per Sam C. Ehrlich Associate Professor, @BoiseStateCOBE lawyer
What happens if the NCAA wins?
The current environment will largely stay put. There will be no class-wide injunction (unless a new one is granted by the district court later). However, to be clear, this decision will NOT affect any injunctions granted by other courts.

What happens if the players' win?
The injunction will be restored, and all Class of 2022 athletes will be eligible. Of note, however: this injunction explicitly did not cover rules regarding professional status or transfers; all that would have to be worked out later.

The NCAA could petition for en banc review, i.e., where the entire court hears the case rather than just a three judge panel. It could also petition the Supreme Court for emergency relief.
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 26840
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby muskieman » Tue Oct 13, 2026 3:26 pm

Michael McCann @McCannSportsLaw Legal Expert @Sportico . Associate Dean, Professor of Law and SELI Director
@UNHLaw . Visiting Professor of Law @Harvard_Law

3h
Having just listened to the oral argument in Wisne v. NCAA at the 10th Circuit, I think the NCAA will win 3-0 and it won't be close. With attorney Rakesh Kilaru arguing for the NCAA, the NCAA had a great day in court. The nationwide injunction is highly likely to be reversed IMO.
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 26840
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby muskieman » Wed Oct 14, 2026 7:02 pm

After DeWine signs EO the Supreme Court of Ohio


Paul Fritschner @PaulFritschner

BREAKING: The Ohio Supreme Court has stayed the decision by the First District Court of Appeals.

The players that are part of the Ohio 5-in-5 lawsuit are eligible while more information is collected from both parties.
Image
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
skyhops
Posts: 3931
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby skyhops » Thu Oct 15, 2026 7:12 am

Is Filip eligible? We really need based on what I saw last week. An extra wing will help spread court and bring up the ball since Westry seemed scared to attack the press.
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 26840
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby muskieman » Thu Oct 15, 2026 12:33 pm

He is in Tennessee and for now eligible.

I'd like to see more states do something similar to what Ohio did, because the NCAA would have to litigate on multiple fronts, which might prompt them to change their policy.
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
yellow20xd
Posts: 689
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:41 am
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby yellow20xd » Thu Oct 15, 2026 3:05 pm

My lord... Why have any eligibility rules at all? Just let them play college ball unit they're ready to collect social security... Dan
"The problem with having a sense of humor is often that people you use it on aren't in a very good mood"...
Lou Holtz
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 26840
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby muskieman » Thu Oct 15, 2026 7:18 pm

RA in and gets tied up RA, Nwoko and Filip in 12:01 score 8-8 and just like that Pozz scores on euro step for 2

X shooting 35% Tenn 25%
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.
User avatar
muskieman
Posts: 26840
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10/13 Court testimony 10th circuit

Postby muskieman » Thu Oct 15, 2026 7:23 pm

RA with a 3 and 1 missed the FS. Very sloppy from both teams T13 X 12
I asked a ref if he could give me a technical foul for thinking bad things about him. He said, of course not. I said, well, I think you stink. And he gave me a technical. You can't trust em.

Return to “Xavier Men's Basketball”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 469 guests